Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Metaanalysis of Oncologic Outcomes
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 204 (3), 439-446
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections for cancer in 235 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 yearsSurgical Endoscopy, 2006
- Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2005
- Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2005
- Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Laparoscopic-Assistedvs.Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Prospective Randomized TrialJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2004
- Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Five-year results of 206 laparoscopic left colectomies for cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2002
- Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resectionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1996
- Adequacy of lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic‐assisted colectomy for colorectal cancer: A preliminary reportJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1994