Diuretics: A modern day treatment option? (Review Article)
Open Access
- 29 September 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Nephrology
- Vol. 11 (5), 419-427
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1797.2006.00598.x
Abstract
SUMMARY: The choice of drugs to initiate therapy for the management of hypertension remains contentious and diuretics are central to this controversy. Because most of the major trials involve complex treatment algorithms and allow diverse background treatments, one of the greatest challenges lies in separating out true class‐specific effects – for example, separating true class‐specific effects of diuretics from those of beta blockers. Despite these difficulties, the evidence confirms that diuretics are at least as effective as the newer first line groups in preventing cardiovascular events. The main area of doubt lies in relation to the risk of renal outcomes and of metabolic outcomes, such as new onset diabetes – where the evidence suggests that drugs that inhibit the renin‐angiotensin system may be more protective than all other drug classes. These issues are reflected in the most recent international guidelines, all of which include diuretics among the first‐line drugs for the treatment of hypertension, although they do differ on the role of diuretics in the initiation of therapy. Diuretics remain important for treating hypertension, especially in combination with other drug classes. The particular place of diuretics in the rank order of drugs must be tailored to suit the clinical situation in the individual patient. This will vary from a preferred option, as in black patients or elderly patients with systolic hypertension, to a second‐line option in patients at high risk of developing new onset diabetes.Keywords
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke, Eprosartan Compared With Nitrendipine for Secondary PreventionStroke, 2005
- Adverse Prognostic Significance of New Diabetes in Treated Hypertensive SubjectsHypertension, 2004
- Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood PressureHypertension, 2003
- Effect of Low-Dose Perindopril/Indapamide on Albuminuria in DiabetesHypertension, 2003
- Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)Jama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2002
- Renoprotective properties of ACE-inhibition in non-diabetic nephropathies with non-nephrotic proteinuriaThe Lancet, 1999
- The fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V)Archives of Internal Medicine, 1993
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease *1Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution biasThe Lancet, 1990
- The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood PressureArchives of Internal Medicine, 1988
- The 1984 Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood PressureArchives of Internal Medicine, 1984