Variability in Obtaining Institutional Review Board Approval for Quality Improvement Activities in Residency Programs
Open Access
- 1 March 2012
- journal article
- Published by Journal of Graduate Medical Education in Journal of Graduate Medical Education
- Vol. 4 (1), 106-108
- https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-11-00176.1
Abstract
Introduction Quality improvement (QI) activities are an important part of residency training. National studies are needed to inform best practices in QI training and experience for residents. The impact of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process on such studies is not well described. Methods This observational study looked at time, length, comfort level, and overall quality of experience for 42 residency training programs in obtaining approval or exemption for a nationally based educational QI study. Results For the 42 programs in the study, the time period to IRB approval/exemption was highly variable, ranging from less than 1 week to 56.5 weeks; mean and median time was approximately 18 weeks (SD, 10.8). Greater reported comfort with the IRB process was associated with less time to obtain approval (r = −.50; P < .01; 95% CI, −0.70 to −0.23). A more positive overall quality of experience with the IRB process was also associated with less time to obtain IRB approval (r = −.60; P < .01; 95% CI, −0.74 to −0.36). Discussion The IRB process for residency programs initiating QI studies shows considerable variance that is not explained by attributes of the projects. New strategies are needed to assist and expedite IRB processes for QI research in educational settings and reduce interinstitutional variability and increase comfort level among educators with the IRB process.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Crafting Successful Relationships with the IRBAcademic Medicine, 2007
- Medical Education Research and IRB Review: An Analysis and Comparison of the IRB Review Process at Six InstitutionsAcademic Medicine, 2007
- The Ethics of Using Quality Improvement Methods in Health CareAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2007
- A Survey of Academic Medical Centers to Distinguish Between Quality Improvement and Research ActivitiesQuality Management in Health Care, 2006
- Unique challenges of obtaining regulatory approval for a multicenter protocol to study the genetics of RRP and suggested remediesOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 2006
- Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus projectQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2005
- Institutional Review Boards and Multisite Studies in Health Services Research: Is There a Better Way?Health Services Research, 2005
- A Call for Outcomes Research in Medical EducationAcademic Medicine, 2004
- Medical Education ResearchAcademic Medicine, 2004
- Problematic Variation in Local Institutional Review of a Multicenter Genetic Epidemiology StudyJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2003