Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 68 (2), 121-132
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4797(03)00014-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using decision analysis to encourage sound deliberation: water use planning in British Columbia, CanadaJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2002
- The Era of Management Is OverEcosystems, 2001
- Indicators of Biodiversity for Ecologically Sustainable Forest ManagementConservation Biology, 2000
- Managing forests to sustain biodiversity: Substituting accomplishment for motionThe Forestry Chronicle, 1998
- Conflicts and Choices in Biodiversity PreservationJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1998
- Operational criteria for sustainable forestry: focussing on the essenceThe Forestry Chronicle, 1997
- An Introduction to Bayesian Inference for Ecological Research and Environmental Decision‐MakingEcological Applications, 1996
- The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of AlternativesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Attitudes, Knowledge, and Behavior Toward Wildlife Among the Industrial Superpowers: United States, Japan, and GermanyJournal of Social Issues, 1993
- Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problemsIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1991