Within-Subject Blood Pressure Level—Not Variability—Predicts Fatal and Nonfatal Outcomes in a General Population
- 1 November 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Hypertension
- Vol. 60 (5), 1138-1147
- https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.202143
Abstract
To assess the prognostic significance of blood pressure (BP) variability, we followed health outcomes in a family-based random population sample representative of the general population (n=2944; mean age: 44.9 years; 50.7% women). At baseline, BP was measured 5 times consecutively at each of 2 home visits 2 to 4 weeks apart. We assessed within-subject overall (10 readings), within- and between-visit systolic BP variability from variability independent of the mean, the difference between maximum and minimum BP, and average real variability. Over a median follow-up of 12 years, 401 deaths occurred and 311 participants experienced a fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular event. Overall systolic BP variability averaged (SD) 5.45 (2.82) units, 15.87 (8.36) mmHg, and 4.08 (2.05) mmHg for variability independent of the mean, difference between maximum and minimum BP, and average real variability, respectively. Female sex, older age, higher-mean systolic BP, lower body mass index, a history of peripheral arterial disease, and use of β-blockers were the main correlates of systolic BP variability. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, overall and within- and between-visit BP variability did not predict total or cardiovascular mortality or the composite of any fatal plus nonfatal cardiovascular end point. For instance, the hazard ratios for all cardiovascular events combined in relation to overall variability independent of the mean, difference between maximum and minimum BP, and average real variability were 1.05 (0.96–1.15), 1.06 (0.96–1.16), and 1.08 (0.98–1.19), respectively. By contrast, mean systolic BP was a significant predictor of all end points under study, independent of BP variability. In conclusion, in an unbiased population sample, BP variability did not contribute to risk stratification over and beyond mean systolic BP.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic Value of the Variability in Home-Measured Blood Pressure and Heart RateHypertension, 2012
- The impact of visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure on renal functionHypertension Research, 2011
- Wars, War Games, and Dead Bodies on the BattlefieldStroke, 2011
- Effect of Dose and Combination of Antihypertensives on Interindividual Blood Pressure VariabilityStroke, 2011
- Maximum Value of Home Blood PressureHypertension, 2011
- The Relationship Between Visit-to-Visit Variability in Systolic Blood Pressure and All-Cause Mortality in the General PopulationHypertension, 2011
- Awake Systolic Blood Pressure Variability Correlates With Target-Organ Damage in Hypertensive SubjectsHypertension, 2007
- 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)European Heart Journal, 2006
- High remaining risk in poorly treated hypertension: the ‘rule of halves’ still existsJournal of Hypertension, 2002
- Prognostic Significance of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate VariabilitiesHypertension, 2000