Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography in Staging Early Prostate Cancer
- 6 September 1990
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 323 (10), 621-626
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199009063231001
Abstract
In 1987, a cooperative study group consisting of five institutions was formed to determine the relative benefits of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endorectal (transrectal) ultrasonography in evaluating patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (stage Ta or Tb).Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Androgen sensitivity of rat prostate carcinoma studied by31P NMR spectroscopy,1H MR imaging, and23Na MR imagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1989
- Transrectal probe for 1H MRI and 31P MR spectroscopy of the prostate glandMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1989
- Comparing clinical staging plus transrectal ultrasound with surgical-pathologic staging of prostate cancerUrology, 1989
- In Vivo13C NMR Spectroscopy of the Human ProstateMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1988
- Relative merits of mri, transrectal endosonography and ct in diagnosis and staging of carcinoma of prostateUrology, 1988
- Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in detecting and staging prostatic cancerUrology, 1988
- The accuracy of CT in the staging of carcinoma of the prostateAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1987
- PATTERNS OF PROGRESSION IN PROSTATE CANCERThe Lancet, 1986
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Computed Tomography and Transabdominal Ultrasound in the Evaluation of the ProstateJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1977