Estimating Ability With the Wrong Model
- 20 December 1987
- journal article
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Journal of Educational Statistics
- Vol. 12 (4), 339-368
- https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986012004339
Abstract
No model is ever a perfect reflection of the data it is to summarize. There are always errors of fit. This is as true with modern item response theory (IRT) as with all other models. It is important to know to what extent the accuracy of measurement made with these models is influenced by misfit and what can be done to minimize the inaccuracy. First, a detailed general model was fit to data to provide the framework for a realistic simulation structure. Then three of the most commonly used IRT models were fit in this simulation. A variety of robust estimators of ability were used and the accuracy and efficiency of each estimator was determined. With short tests, a simple model coupled with a robust estimator seemed to be the methodology of choice for describing the data. As test length increased, so too did the benefits of utilizing a more complex parameterization. An unexpected finding was that coupling robust estimators with a Bayesian prior yielded substantial shrinkage. Future work on ability estimation, especially for practical applications of adaptive testing, is required to “unshrink” ability estimates.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR SIMULATION EVALUATION OF IRT ABILITY ESTIMATORSETS Research Report Series, 1984
- ESTIMATING ABILITY WITH THREE ITEM RESPONSE MODELS WHEN THE MODELS ARE WRONG AND THEIR PARAMETERS ARE INACCURATEETS Research Report Series, 1984
- A response model for multiple choice itemsPsychometrika, 1984
- Some standard errors in item response theoryPsychometrika, 1982
- Biweight Estimates of Latent AbilityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
- REDESCENDING M‐TYPE ESTIMATORS OF LATENT ABILITYETS Research Report Series, 1982
- Robust estimation of ability in the Rasch modelPsychometrika, 1980
- NOTES ON BIAS IN ESTIMATIONBiometrika, 1956