Is Privacy Policy Language Irrelevant to Consumers?
- 1 June 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The Journal of Legal Studies
- Vol. 45 (S2), S69-S95
- https://doi.org/10.1086/689933
Abstract
This article reports the results of two experiments in which large, census-weighted samples of Americans read short excerpts from Facebook’s, Yahoo’s, and Google’s privacy policies, which are at issue in high-stakes privacy class-action lawsuits. Subjects were randomly assigned to read language from either vague policies, some of which had been adjudicated insufficient to notify consumers about the companies’ practices, or explicit policies. Though many experimental subjects read these privacy policy excerpts closely, subjects who saw the explicit policies did not differ from those who saw vague policies in their assessment of whether their assent to the policies would permit the corporate practices at issue. Subjects generally stated that agreement to either vague or explicit language authorized companies to collect or use their personal information, even though consumers regarded these corporate practices as intrusive. These experiments show that courts and laypeople can understand the same privacy policy language quite differently.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Privacy Notices as Tabula Rasa: An Empirical Investigation into how Complying with a Privacy Notice is Related to Meeting Privacy Expectations OnlineJournal of Marketing & Public Policy, 2015
- An empirical investigation of privacy breach perceptions among smartphone application usersComputers in Human Behavior, 2015
- Privacy and human behavior in the age of informationScience, 2015
- Frequent Flyer Programs: Empirically Assessing Consumers' Reasonable ExpectationsAmerican Business Law Journal, 2014
- What Is Privacy Worth?The Journal of Legal Studies, 2013
- Blind consent? A social psychological investigation of non-readership of click-through agreements.Law and Human Behavior, 2012
- Does Contract Disclosure Matter?Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 2012
- Experimental Evidence of the Relationship between Reading the Fine Print and Performance of Form-Contract TermsJournal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 2012
- Some Realities of Online ContractingSupreme Court Economic Review, 2011
- Will Internet Users Pay for Online Content?Journal of Advertising Research, 2004