Communicating scientific uncertainty
Open Access
- 15 September 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 111 (supplement), 13664-13671
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317504111
Abstract
All science has uncertainty. Unless that uncertainty is communicated effectively, decision makers may put too much or too little faith in it. The information that needs to be communicated depends on the decisions that people face. Are they (i) looking for a signal (e.g., whether to evacuate before a hurricane), (ii) choosing among fixed options (e.g., which medical treatment is best), or (iii) learning to create options (e.g., how to regulate nanotechnology)? We examine these three classes of decisions in terms of how to characterize, assess, and convey the uncertainties relevant to each. We then offer a protocol for summarizing the many possible sources of uncertainty in standard terms, designed to impose a minimal burden on scientists, while gradually educating those whose decisions depend on their work. Its goals are better decisions, better science, and better support for science.This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Drug Facts Box: Improving the communication of prescription drug informationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
- The sciences of science communicationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
- Assessing what to address in science communicationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
- Bridging the gap between science and decision makingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
- Prior Storm Experience Moderates Water Surge Perception and RiskPLOS ONE, 2013
- Sources of non-compliance with clinical practice guidelines in trauma triage: a decision science studyImplementation Science, 2012
- Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statisticsBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2012
- Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradoxOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990
- Reporting standards and research strategies for controlled trials: Agenda for the editorControlled Clinical Trials, 1980