A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Continued Influence of Misinformation in the Face of Correction: How Powerful Is It, Why Does It Happen, and How to Stop It?
Top Cited Papers
- 22 June 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Communication Research
- Vol. 47 (2), 155-177
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219854600
Abstract
A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the extent of continued influence of misinformation in the face of correction and the theoretical explanations of this phenomenon. Aggregation of results from 32 studies (N = 6,527) revealed that, on average, correction does not entirely eliminate the effect of misinformation (r = –.05, p = .045). Corrective messages were found to be more successful when they are coherent, consistent with the audience’s worldview, and delivered by the source of the misinformation itself. Corrections are less effective if the misinformation was attributed to a credible source, the misinformation has been repeated multiple times prior to correction, or when there was a time lag between the delivery of the misinformation and the correction. These findings are consistent with predictions based on theories of mental models and offer concrete recommendations for practitioners.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering MisinformationPsychological Science, 2017
- Schema Theory and Mental ModelsPublished by Wiley ,2017
- The sky is falling: evidence of a negativity bias in the social transmission of informationEvolution and Human Behavior, 2017
- Interventions to Correct Misinformation about Tobacco ProductsTobacco Regulatory Science, 2015
- Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political MisinformationBritish Journal of Political Science, 2015
- How to protect eyewitness memory against the misinformation effect: A meta-analysis of post-warning studiesJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2014
- Meta-Analytic Examination of the Base-Rate FallacyCommunication Research Reports, 2006
- Bad is Stronger than GoodReview of General Psychology, 2001
- EFFECTS OF IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED ERROR CORRECTION ON THE ACQUISITION AND MAINTENANCE OF SIGHT WORDS BY STUDENTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIESJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1994
- Detecting and Correcting Deceptive AdvertisingJournal of Consumer Research, 1979