A model for continuous quality control incorporating sample‐to‐sample assessment of optical alignment, fluorescence sensitivity, and volumetric operation of flow cytometers
Open Access
- 7 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry
- Vol. 78B (3), 201-210
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.20520
Abstract
Background: Bead count rate (BCR) monitoring successfully identifies pipetting error during single platform CD4 enumeration. Despite rigorous prescribed quality control performed, preliminary data suggested that BCR outliers could also be attributed to occasional failure of flow cytometric volumetric operation. The aim of this report was to use counting beads in a model of continuous quality control (CQC) to monitor overall flow cytometric performance (laser alignment, fluorescence stability and volumetric operation). Methods: The proposed CQC model used FlowCheck™ and IMMUNOTROL™ blood controls daily. Extended monitoring of fluidics (FPV; beads and sheath only) and sample preparation (SPV; blood, IMMUNOPREP™ and beads) was done daily on five flow cytometers over five consecutive days prior to testing patient samples. Sample-to-sample CQC included monitoring BCR, selected time/fluorescence histograms (Time vs. Count; Time vs. Fluorescence and Forward Scatter vs. Fluorescence) and full peak coefficient of variation (FPCV) for 2000 samples tested. Results: Prescribed quality controls showed Half Peak CV values of <2% (FlowCheck) with Immunotrol within 0.5SD of the target means. Laser stability was confirmed (FPCV values <2%). However, fluidics (volumetric operation) fluctuated as indicated by a 3.2% BCR outlier rate of 2,000 samples tested (minus pipetting error) despite optimal fluidics performance verified at start-up (FPV CV < 3%). Conclusions: Sustained laser stability was confirmed with Time vs. Fluorescence histograms, but Time vs. Count histograms were insufficient to detect intermittent volumetric failure. The proposed CQC model, incorporating BCR monitoring with time/fluorescence histograms and FPCV monitoring can identify all volumetric inconsistencies in real-time. © 2010 Clinical Cytometry SocietyKeywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- CD4+T-lymphocyte enumeration with a flow-rate based method in three flow cytometers with different years in serviceCytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, 2008
- The fragile environments of inexpensive CD4+ T-cell enumeration in the least developed countries: Strategies for accessible supportCytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, 2008
- Flow rate calibration. III. The use of stabilized biostandards to calibrate the flow rate and calculate absolute CD4+ T-cell countsCytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, 2006
- Monitoring reproducibility of single analysis, single platform CD4 cell counts in a high volume, low resource laboratory setting using sequential bead count ratesCytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, 2005
- CD45‐assisted PanLeucogating for accurate, cost‐effective dual‐platform CD4+ T‐cell enumerationCytometry, 2002
- Evaluation of a universal template for single-platform absolute T-lymphocyte subset enumerationCytometry, 2002
- Fluorescence Intensity Calibration for Immunophenotyping by Flow CytometryMethods, 2000
- Model system evaluating fluorescein‐labeled microbeads as internal standards to calibrate fluorescence intensity on flow cytometersCytometry, 1989
- Simple methods to determine and compare the sensitivity of flow cytometersCytometry, 1982
- Immunofluorescent analysis of blood cells by flow cytometryInternational Journal of Immunopharmacology, 1981