MR Microimaging of Benign and Malignant Nodes in the Neck
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 186 (3), 749-757
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.04.1832
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. We evaluated the diagnostic criteria of high-resolution MRI in differentiating benign and malignant cervical nodes that were palpable and superficial in the neck. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We performed MR microimaging on 24 histologically proven metastatic nodes, 14 histologically proven lymphomas, and 35 histologically or clinically proven benign nodes in the necks of 26 patients. The lymph nodes were imaged with T1-weighted spin-echo, fat-suppressed T2-weighted turbo spin-echo, and spin-echo diffusion-weighted echo-planar sequences using a 47-mm microscopy coil. RESULTS. MR microimaging provided high-resolution images of the nodes. Hilar fat was lost in 92%, 79%, and 46% of the metastatic nodes, lymphomas, and benign nodes, respectively. Smooth nodal margins were lost in 58%, 23%, and 9% of metastatic nodes, lymphomas, and benign nodes, respectively. Heterogeneous nodal parenchyma on T1- or fat-suppressed T2-weighted images, or both, was observed in 88%, 29%, and 23% of metastatic nodes, lymphomas, and benign nodes, respectively. The apparent diffusion coefficients were significantly different among these three node groups (p < 0.001), with metastatic nodes being the highest, followed by benign nodes. Logistic regression analyses showed that heterogeneous nodal parenchyma and apparent diffusion coefficient levels were significant in discriminating metastatic nodes, and apparent diffusion coefficient levels in discriminating lymphomas. Combined use of these MR microscopic criteria on nodal architecture and apparent diffusion coefficients yielded 90% accuracy (86% sensitivity, 94% specificity) and 93% accuracy (85% sensitivity, 95% specificity) for discriminating metastatic nodes and lymphomas, respectively. CONCLUSION. The nodal architecture and apparent diffusion coefficient levels on MR microimaging may provide useful information in diagnosing benign and malignant nodes in the neck.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- MR Mammary Ductography Using a Microscopy Coil for Assessment of Intraductal LesionsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2004
- Necrosis in Metastatic Neck Nodes: Diagnostic Accuracy of CT, MR Imaging, and USRadiology, 2004
- MR imaging of lymph nodes in the head and neckMagnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, 2002
- High-resolution and color doppler ultrasonography of cervical lymphadenopathy in childrenActa Radiologica, 2001
- Comparison of Sonography and CT for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and NeckAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Comparison of CT and MR imaging in staging of neck metastases.Radiology, 1998
- Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1997
- Central nodal necrosis and extracapsular neoplastic spread in cervical lymph nodes: MR imaging versus CT.Radiology, 1992
- Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria.Radiology, 1990
- Small arteries in peripheral lymph nodes: a specific US sign of lymphomatous involvement.Radiology, 1988