Elevated central venous pressure is associated with impairment of microcirculatory blood flow in sepsis: a hypothesis generating post hoc analysis
Open Access
- 7 August 2013
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Anesthesiology
- Vol. 13 (1), 17
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-13-17
Abstract
Microcirculatory driving pressure is defined as the difference between post-arteriolar and venular pressure. In previous research, an absence of correlation between mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and microcirculatory perfusion has been observed. However, the microcirculation may be considered as a low pressure compartment with capillary pressure closer to venous than to arterial pressure. From this perspective, it is conceivable that central venous pressure (CVP) plays a more important role in determination of capillary perfusion. We aimed to explore associations between CVP and microcirculatory perfusion. We performed a post-hoc analysis of a prospective study in septic patients who were resuscitated according a strict non-CVP guided treatment protocol. Simultaneous measurements of hemodynamics and sublingual Sidestream Dark Field imaging were obtained 0 and 30 minutes after fulfillment of resuscitation goals. Data were examined for differences in microcirculatory variables for CVP ≤ or > 12 mmHg and its evolution over time, as well as for predictors of a microvascular flow index (MFI) < 2.6. In 70 patients with a mean APACHE II score of 21, 140 simultaneous measurements of CVP and sublingual microcirculation (vessels < 20 µmeter) were obtained. (MFI) and the percentage of perfused small vessels (PPV) were significantly lower in the 'high' CVP (> 12 mmHg) group as compared to patients in the 'low' CVP (≤12 mmHg) group (1.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.9 ± 0.9, P = 0.006; and 88 ± 21% vs. 95 ± 8%, P = 0.006 respectively). Perfusion pressure (MAP-CVP) and cardiac output did not differ significantly between both CVP groups. From time point 0 to 30 minutes, a significant increase in MFI (from 1.6 ± 0.6 to 1.8 ± 0.9, P = 0.027) but not in PPV, was observed, while CVP and perfusion pressure significantly decreased in the same period. In a multivariate model CVP > 12 mmHg was the only significant predictor for a capillary MFI < 2.6 (Odds ratio 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.1-5.8), P = 0.026). We observed a significant association between a higher CVP and impairment of microcirculatory blood flow. Further research is needed to elaborate on our hypothesis generating findings that an elevated CVP may act as an outflow obstruction of organ perfusion.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Microcirculatory blood flow as a tool to select ICU patients eligible for fluid therapyIntensive Care Medicine, 2012
- Quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in healthy volunteers and in patients with septic shock*Critical Care Medicine, 2012
- Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality*Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- The role of vasoactive agents in the resuscitation of microvascular perfusion and tissue oxygenation in critically ill patientsIntensive Care Medicine, 2010
- The effects of intravenous nitroglycerine and norepinephrine on gastric microvascular perfusion in an experimental model of gastric tube reconstructionSurgery, 2010
- Coupling microcirculation to systemic hemodynamicsCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2010
- Effects of nitroglycerin on sublingual microcirculatory blood flow in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock after a strict resuscitation protocol: A double-blind randomized placebo controlled trialCritical Care Medicine, 2010
- The effect of increasing doses of norepinephrine on tissue oxygenation and microvascular flow in patients with septic shock*Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- Measurement of functional microcirculatory geometry and velocity distributions using automated image analysisMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2008
- Regulation of Blood Flow in the MicrocirculationMicrocirculation, 2005