Engineers are from PDMS-land, Biologists are from Polystyrenia
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Lab on a Chip
- Vol. 12 (7), 1224-1237
- https://doi.org/10.1039/c2lc20982a
Abstract
As the integration of microfluidics into cell biology research proceeds at an ever-increasing pace, a critical question for those working at the interface of both disciplines is which device material to use for a given application. While PDMS and soft lithography methods offer the engineer rapid prototyping capabilities, PDMS as a material has characteristics that have known adverse effects on cell-based experiments. In contrast, while polystyrene (PS), the most commonly used thermoplastic for laboratory cultureware, has provided decades of grounded and validated research conclusions in cell behavior and function, PS as a material has posed significant challenges in microfabrication. These competing issues have forced microfluidics engineers and biologists to make compromises in how they approach specific research questions, and furthermore, have attenuated the impact of microfluidics on biological research. In this review, we provide a comparison of the attributes of PDMS and PS, and discuss reasons for their popularity in their respective fields. We provide a critical evaluation of the strengths and limitations of PDMS and PS in relation to the advancement and future impact on microfluidic cell-based studies and applications. We believe that engineers have a responsibility to overcome any challenges associated with microfabrication, whether with PS or other materials, and that engineers should provide options and solutions that assist biologists in their experimental design. Our goal is not to advocate for any specific material, but provide guidelines for researchers who desire to choose the most suitable material for their application, and suggest important research directions for engineers working at the interface between microfabrication technology and biological application.Keywords
This publication has 100 references indexed in Scilit:
- Substrate Viscosity Enhances Correlation in Epithelial Sheet MovementBiophysical Journal, 2011
- Rapid Prototyping of Arrayed Microfluidic Systems in Polystyrene for Cell-Based AssaysAnalytical Chemistry, 2011
- Clinical microfluidics for neutrophil genomics and proteomicsNature Medicine, 2010
- Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substratesNature Methods, 2010
- Single-cell NF-κB dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processingNature, 2010
- Hyperoxia augments ER-stress-induced cell death independent of BiP lossFree Radical Biology & Medicine, 2009
- Interactions between Multiple Cell Types in Parallel Microfluidic Channels: Monitoring Platelet Adhesion to an Endothelium in the Presence of an Anti-Adhesion DrugAnalytical Chemistry, 2008
- Microfluidics meet cell biology: bridging the gap by validation and application of microscale techniques for cell biological assaysBioEssays, 2008
- Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technologyNature, 2007
- Characterization and Resolution of Evaporation-Mediated Osmolality Shifts That Constrain Microfluidic Cell Culture in Poly(dimethylsiloxane) DevicesAnalytical Chemistry, 2006