Outcomes and Impacts of Development Interventions
Open Access
- 6 May 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Journal of Evaluation
- Vol. 39 (4), 478-495
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018765698
Abstract
The terms “outcome” and “impact” are ubiquitous in evaluation discourse. However, there are many competing definitions that lack clarity and consistency and sometimes represent fundamentally different meanings. This leads to profound confusion, undermines efforts to improve learning and accountability, and represents a challenge for the evaluation profession. This article investigates how the terms are defined and understood by different institutions and communities. It systematically investigates representative sets of definitions, analyzing them to identify 16 distinct defining elements. This framework is then used to compare definitions and assess their usefulness and limitations. Based on this assessment, the article proposes a remedy in three parts: applying good definition practice in future definition updates, differentiating causal perspectives and using appropriate causal language, and employing meaningful qualifiers when using the terms outcome and impact. The article draws on definitions used in international development, but its findings also apply to domestic public sector policies and interventions.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rethinking higher education and its relationship with social inequalities: past knowledge, present state and future potentialPalgrave Communications, 2017
- Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary contextResearch Evaluation, 2015
- Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluationsPublished by Austrian Platform for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation (FTEVAL) ,2012