Does cancer that occurs during or after anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy have a worse prognosis? A national assessment of overall and site-specific cancer survival in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologic agents
Open Access
- 18 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 63 (7), 1812-1822
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30247
Abstract
Objective Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) may affect tumor development and spreading. While data on the incidence of cancer following anti-TNF therapy have been published, the purpose of this study was to examine the clinical presentation and outcome of cancers that develop during or after anti-TNF therapy. Methods By linking data from Swedish clinical registries of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, including Anti-Rheumatic Therapy in Sweden (ARTIS), the Swedish Biologics Register, with nationwide data on hospitalizations and outpatient visits for RA, we assembled a cohort of 78,483 RA patients who were alive in 1999 or who entered the cohort thereafter. Of these, 8,562 patients started therapy with a biologic agent (98% started an anti-TNF) during the period from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2007. Linkage to the Swedish Cancer Register and other registers identified first primary cancers occurring during 1999–2007 as well as post-cancer survival through March 31, 2009. Through this linkage, we identified 314 cancers in patients who were undergoing, or had a history of, treatment with biologic agents and 4,650 cancers in patients who were biologics-naive at the time of cancer diagnosis. The distributions of tumor stage among the biologics-exposed and the biologics-naive patients were compared. The relative risk of death among the biologics-exposed versus the 586 matched biologics-naive cancer cases were assessed by Cox regression analyses. Through chart review in a defined subset, we gathered additional clinical information and validated the diagnoses. Results For all cancers combined, the distribution of cancer stages at the time of cancer diagnosis was largely similar between those in the biologics-exposed and the matched biologics-naive groups. Based on the total of 113 deaths among those with cancer in the biologics-exposed group versus the 256 deaths among those with cancer in the biologics-naive group, the relative risk of death following cancer associated with exposure to anti-TNF was 1.1 (95% confidence interval 0.8–1.6). Conclusion During routine care, cancers that occur following anti-TNF therapy are not characterized by any markedly altered stage at presentation or by altered post-cancer survival rates.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ten years with biologics: to whom do data on effectiveness and safety apply?Rheumatology, 2010
- Generalisability of clinical registers used for drug safety and comparative effectiveness research: coverage of the Swedish Biologics RegisterAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2010
- Improving TNF as a cancer therapeutic: Tailor‐made TNF fusion proteins with conserved antitumor activity and reduced systemic side effectsBioFactors, 2009
- Tumour necrosis factor and cancerNature Reviews Cancer, 2009
- The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register – a sample survey for year 1998Acta Oncologica, 2009
- Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000–02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 dataThe Lancet Oncology, 2007
- All-cause and cause-specific mortality in rheumatoid arthritis are not greater than expected when treated with tumour necrosis factor antagonistsAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2007
- Anti-TNF Antibody Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Risk of Serious Infections and MalignanciesJAMA, 2006
- Tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy and lymphoma development: Twenty‐six cases reported to the Food and Drug AdministrationArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988