Network Oncology (NO) - a Clinical Cancer Register for Health Services Research and the Evaluation of Integrative Therapeutic Interventions in Anthroposophic Medicine
- 1 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Complementary Medicine Research
- Vol. 20 (5), 353-360
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000356204
Abstract
Background: Concepts of integrative oncology (IO), as have been offered by anthroposophic medicine (AM) for decades, are gaining increasing interest and acceptance. Central aspects are multimodal therapeutic interventions, health-related quality of live, and patients' preference as well as therapeutic relationship and clinical outcome. Despite its broad application, IO lacks evaluation in clinical practice and complementary therapies are not monitored by any cancer registries. Methods: To close this gap we established 'Network Oncology' (NO), a conjoint registry of German outpatient AM practitioners and AM hospitals. In this paper we present the project and a first data overview and compare it to epidemiological registers and current literature. Results: NO has collected 10,405 cancer patients' records in 6 years. Compared to epidemiological registers our data show minor differences in disease entity distribution, age, and gender. There is an overproportional amount of young breast cancer patients in NO institutions indicating a demand for integrative therapies in this group. There is no difference between the UICC (Union for International Cancer Control) stages at first diagnosis and at admission to a NO facility. According to our data conventional therapies were less frequently administered after admission to a NO facility. Nevertheless, one third of the patients received their first conventional therapy in a NO facility. 80% of the patients received mistletoe preparations and 63% had nonpharmacotherapeutic, complementary interventions. Conclusion: Integrative oncological approaches attract a great number of patients visiting AM institutions. The NO provides an infrastructure to evaluate integrative interventions in AM, allows comparison to other clinical registers, and thus can contribute to health service research in this field.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2012Annals of Oncology, 2012
- The decline in breast cancer mortality in Europe: An update (to 2009)The Breast, 2012
- How Many Cancer Patients Use Complementary and Alternative MedicineIntegrative Cancer Therapies, 2011
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Comparison of Current Knowledge, Attitudes and Interest among German Medical Students and DoctorsEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2011
- Pharmacotherapy of elderly patients in everyday anthroposophic medical practice: a prospective, multicenter observational studyBMC Geriatrics, 2010
- Survival of cancer patients treated with mistletoe extract (Iscador): a systematic literature reviewBMC Cancer, 2009
- Patients' Interactions With Physicians and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practitioners: Older Women With Breast Cancer and Self-Managed Health CareIntegrative Cancer Therapies, 2009
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Attitudes and Patterns of Use by German Physicians in a National SurveyThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2008
- The role of cancer registries in cancer controlInternational Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008