Thick vs. Thin Gingival Biotypes: A Key Determinant in Treatment Planning for Dental Implants
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of the California Dental Association
- Vol. 36 (3), 193-198
- https://doi.org/10.1080/19424396.2008.12221481
Abstract
During the treatment planning process, it is important to recognize differences in gingival tissue can affect treatment outcomes. The concept that thick and thin gingival biotypes have different responses to inflammation and trauma was previously introduced. In this paper, this concept is expanded in that gingival biotypes dictate different procedures for implant site preparation. With appreciation of these differences, preparatory steps can be taken to create a more ideal implant placement site.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bifid Mandibular Canal in JapaneseImplant Dentistry, 2007
- Success of Dental Implants Placed in Intraoral Block Bone GraftsThe Journal of Periodontology, 2007
- Thick Versus Thin Gingival Tissue: A Key Determinant in Tissue Response to Disease and Restorative TreatmentJournal of the California Dental Association, 2002
- A Bone Regenerative Approach to Alveolar Ridge Maintenance Following Tooth Extraction. Report of 10 CasesThe Journal of Periodontology, 1997
- The Effect of the Distance From the Contact Point to the Crest of Bone on the Presence or Absence of the Interproximal Dental PapillaThe Journal of Periodontology, 1992
- Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisorsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1991
- Physiologic Dimensions of the Periodontium Significant to the Restorative DentistThe Journal of Periodontology, 1979
- A Reevaluation of Osseous SurgeryDental Clinics of North America, 1969
- Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extractionThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1967
- Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagittal sections and serial cephalometric roentgenogramsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1963