Blunt-tipped versus sharp-tipped needles: wound morbidity
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 18 (1), 18-19
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01443619868190
Abstract
Blunt-tipped needles have previously been shown to reduce needle-stick injury but the issue of morbidity had not been addressed. As awareness of the need for universal precautions heightens, concerns have been raised about any possible morbidity brought about by their use. We present the results of a randomised, controlled study which investigated wound morbidity following caesarean section. Of the 204 women randomised to closure with sharp or blunt-tipped needles, none developed anything other than superficial infection and there were no significant differences between the two groups. We conclude that the use of blunt-tipped needles does not cause an increase in wound morbidity.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reducing the risk of blood borne infection in surgical practiceBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1995
- Controlled trial of polyglycolic acid versus catgut and nylon for appendicectomy wound closureBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- The incidence of glove puncture during caesarean sectionJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- Surgical glove perforationsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988