An Outcome-based Approach for the Creation of Fetal Growth Standards: Do Singletons and Twins Need Separate Standards?
Open Access
- 16 December 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 169 (5), 616-624
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn374
Abstract
Contemporary fetal growth standards are created by using theoretical properties (percentiles) of birth weight (for gestational age) distributions. The authors used a clinically relevant, outcome-based methodology to determine if separate fetal growth standards are required for singletons and twins. All singleton and twin livebirths between 36 and 42 weeks’ gestation in the United States (1995–2002) were included, after exclusions for missing information and other factors (n = 17,811,922). A birth weight range was identified, at each gestational age, over which serious neonatal morbidity and neonatal mortality rates were lowest. Among singleton males at 40 weeks, serious neonatal morbidity/mortality rates were lowest between 3,012 g (95% confidence interval (CI): 3,008, 3,018) and 3,978 g (95% CI: 3,976, 3,980). The low end of this optimal birth weight range for females was 37 g (95% CI: 21, 53) less. The low optimal birth weight was 152 g (95% CI: 121, 183) less for twins compared with singletons. No differences were observed in low optimal birth weight by period (1999–2002 vs. 1995–1998), but small differences were observed for maternal education, race, parity, age, and smoking status. Patterns of birth weight-specific serious neonatal morbidity/neonatal mortality support the need for plurality-specific fetal growth standards.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variations in Mortality and Morbidity by Gestational Age among Infants Born at TermThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2009
- The Missing Data Problem in Birth Weight Percentiles and Thresholds for "Small-for-Gestational-Age"American Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Reconciling the High Rates of Preterm and Postterm Birth in the United StatesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- The use of customised versus population‐based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortalityBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007
- A customised birthweight centile calculator developed for an Australian populationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007
- Neonatal anthropometric charts: what they are, what they are notArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2007
- Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: A French multicenter studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006
- Longitudinal distance standards of fetal growthActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2000
- A birth weight for gestational age standard based on data in the Swedish Medical Birth Registry, 1985–1989European Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- Cluster of perinatal events identifying infants at high risk for death or disabilityThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1988