BIASED INTERROGATIONS?
- 1 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journalism Studies
- Vol. 14 (3), 423-439
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2012.689488
Abstract
This study, based on Swedish data from three elections (2002, 2006 and 2010) and on a revised version of Clayman's and Heritage's conceptualization of aggressive questioning, examines bias in election campaign interviews with leading political figures. In the first part of the study, the prevalence of partisan bias is explored, and this analysis confirms that such bias does not exist. Informed by Conversation Analysis, a limited number of interviews from the 2006 election are investigated in the second part. This analysis also involves questions scripted by journalists, and it compares both quantitatively and qualitatively the differences between the manuscripts and live interaction. The results question the assumption that bias is solely related to journalistic values and actions. The level of aggressiveness in the interviews is also dependent on how the politicians manage the interview questions.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incumbency Bonus in Election News Coverage Explained: The Logics of Political Power and the Media MarketJournal of Communication, 2011
- Political bias in TV interviewsDiscourse & Society, 2010
- A Watershed in White House Journalism: Explaining the Post-1968 Rise of Aggressive Presidential NewsPolitical Communication, 2010
- Announced refusal to answer: a study of norms and accountability in broadcast political interviewsDiscourse Studies, 2009
- The design and scripting of `unscripted' talk: liveness versus control in a TV broadcast interviewMedia, Culture & Society, 2009
- THE COMPLEX VISUAL GENDERING OF POLITICAL WOMEN IN THE PRESSJournalism Studies, 2008
- Partisan Balance and Bias in Network Coverage of the 2000 and 2004 Presidential ElectionsJournal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2008
- Media Bias in Presidential Elections: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Communication, 2000
- Interruptions in Political Interviews: A Study of Margaret Thatcher and Neil KinnockJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 1988
- From interview to conrontation: Observations of the bush/rather encounterResearch on Language and Social Interaction, 1988