Methods for the bias adjustment of meta‐analyses of published observational studies
- 29 July 2012
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 19 (4), 653-657
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01890.x
Abstract
A unique challenge in meta-analysis of observational studies is bias adjustment. Two different approaches have been proposed for doing this - using summary scores versus component scores. The prevailing view on this matter is that summary quality scores are inaccurate because information from its components can cancel each other out. A head-to-head comparison of the component score adjustment with our method using summary scores is undertaken, using data reported by the authors of the component method. It is demonstrated that the consideration of components or of aggregate scores does indeed lead to the same conclusions. Yet, the latter does not require imputation of the direction and magnitude of changes to effect sizes. The summary quality score used for bias adjustment within the context of an appropriate model may be most expedient. Implications for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of observational studies are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials: An empirical exampleContemporary Clinical Trials, 2011
- Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Fat Mass in Children: A Bias-Adjusted Meta-Analysis of Prospective StudiesPLOS ONE, 2011
- Commentary: Adjusting for bias: a user's guide to performing plastic surgery on meta-analyses of observational studies.International Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studiesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analysesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- Bias Modelling in Evidence SynthesisJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2008
- A Quality-Effects Model for Meta-AnalysisEpidemiology, 2008
- Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandonedJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutionsBiostatistics, 2001
- Methodological Quality as a Component of Meta-AnalysisEducational Psychologist, 1985