Improving rates of maternal immunization: Challenges and opportunities
- 9 November 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
- Vol. 12 (4), 857-865
- https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2015.1101524
Abstract
Objectives: An increasing number of vaccines are recommended or are being developed for use during pregnancy to protect women, fetuses, and/or newborns. For vaccines that are already recommended, vaccine uptake is variable and well below desired target. We reviewed the literature related to factors that affect a healthcare provider’s recommendation and a woman’s willingness to be vaccinated during pregnancy. Design: A scoping review of published literature from 2005 to 2015 was undertaken and all relevant articles were abstracted, summarized, and organized thematically. Results: Barriers and facilitators were identified that either decreased or increased the likelihood of a healthcare provider offering and a pregnant woman accepting vaccination during pregnancy. Concern about the safety of vaccines given during pregnancy was the most often cited barrier among both the public and healthcare providers. Other barriers included doubt about the effectiveness of the vaccine, lack of knowledge about the burden of disease, and not feeling oneself to be at risk of the infection. Major facilitators for maternal immunization included specific safety information about the vaccine in pregnant women, strong national recommendations, and healthcare providers who both recommended and provided the vaccine to their patients. Systems barriers such as inadequate facilities and staffing, vaccine purchase and storage, and reimbursement for vaccination were also cited. Evidence-based interventions were few, and included text messaging reminders, chart reminders, and standing orders. Conclusions: In order to have an effective vaccination program, improvements in the uptake of recommended vaccines during pregnancy are needed. A maternal immunization platform is required that normalizes vaccination practice among obstetrical care providers and is supported by basic and continuing education, communication strategy, and a broad range of research.This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- Considerations for a phase-III trial to evaluate a group B Streptococcus polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine in pregnant women for the prevention of early- and late-onset invasive disease in young-infantsVaccine, 2013
- Barriers to influenza vaccination among pregnant womenVaccine, 2013
- Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health programBMC Public Health, 2012
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors of Low-Income Women Considered High Priority for Receiving the Novel Influenza A (H1N1) VaccineMaternal and Child Health Journal, 2012
- Factors influencing women's decisions regarding pertussis vaccine: A decision-making study in the Postpartum Pertussis Immunization Program of a teaching hospital in TaiwanVaccine, 2010
- Using Computer Decision Support to Increase Maternal Postpartum Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis VaccinationObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- Effectiveness of Maternal Influenza Immunization in Mothers and InfantsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Attitudes of US Obstetricians Toward a Combined Tetanus-Diphtheria-Acellular Pertussis Vaccine for AdultsInfectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006
- Neonatal Tetanus in New GuineaBMJ, 1961
- Prenatal multiple immunizationThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1951