Replicability, Confidence, and Priors
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 16 (12), 1009-1012
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01653.x
Abstract
All commentaries concern priors. In this issue of Psychological Science, Cumming graphically demonstrates the implications of our ignorance of δ. Doros and Geier found mistakes in my argument and provide the Bayesian account. Macdonald notes that my program is like Fisher’s, Fisher’s is like the Bayesians’, and the Bayesians’ is incoherent. These Commentaries strengthen the foundation while leaving all conclusions intact.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Replication Probabilities Depend on Prior Probability DistributionsPsychological Science, 2005
- Probability of Replication RevisitedPsychological Science, 2005
- Understanding the Average Probability of ReplicationPsychological Science, 2005
- Bayesian statistical inference in psychology: Comment on Trafimow (2003).Psychological Review, 2005
- An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance TestsPsychological Science, 2005
- The p-value fallacy and how to avoid it.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2003
- Statistical testing and null distributions: What to do when samples are not random.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2003
- Needed: A Ban on the Significance TestPsychological Science, 1997
- Enduring ValuesTechnometrics, 1972
- Significance Tests Which May be Applied to Samples from Any PopulationsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1937