A new noninvasive finger sensor (NICCI system) for cardiac output monitoring
- 5 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in European Journal of Anaesthesiology
- Vol. 39 (8), 695-700
- https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000001705
Abstract
BACKGROUND The new noninvasive finger sensor system NICCI (Getinge; Gothenburg, Sweden) allows continuous cardiac output monitoring. We aimed to investigate its cardiac output measurement performance. OBJECTIVE(S) To investigate the NICCI system's cardiac output measurement performance. DESIGN Prospective method comparison study. SETTING University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. PATIENTS Fifty-one patients after cardiac surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We performed a method comparison study in 51 patients after cardiac surgery to compare NICCI cardiac output (CONICCI) and NICCI cardiac output calibrated to pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output measurement (CONICCI-CAL) with pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output (COPAT). As a secondary analysis we also compared CNAP cardiac output (COCNAP) and externally calibrated CNAP cardiac output (COCNAP-CAL) with COPAT. RESULTS We analysed 299 cardiac output measurement pairs. The mean of the differences (95% limits of agreement) between CONICCI and COPAT was 0.6 (−1.8 to 3.1) l min−1 with a percentage error of 48%. The mean of the differences between CONICCI-CAL and COPAT was −0.4 (−1.9 to 1.1) l min−1 with a percentage error of 29%. The mean of the differences between COCNAP and COPAT was 1.0 (−1.8 to 3.8) l min−1 with a percentage error of 53%. The mean of the differences between COCNAP-CAL and COPAT was −0.2 (−2.0 to 1.6) l min−1 with a percentage error of 35%. CONCLUSION The agreement between CONICCI and COPAT is not clinically acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered in the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00023189) after inclusion of the first patient on October 2, 2020.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of volume clamp method-based continuous noninvasive cardiac output (CNCO) measurement versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patientsJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2017
- Methodology of method comparison studies evaluating the validity of cardiac output monitors: a stepwise approach and checklist † †This Article is accompanied by Editorial Aew110.British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2016
- Continuous noninvasive cardiac output determination using the CNAP system: evaluation of a cardiac output algorithm for the analysis of volume clamp method-derived pulse contourJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2015
- Cardiac output method comparison studies: the relation of the precision of agreement and the precision of methodJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2015
- 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and managementEuropean Heart Journal, 2014
- Effect of a Perioperative, Cardiac Output–Guided Hemodynamic Therapy Algorithm on Outcomes Following Major Gastrointestinal SurgeryJAMA, 2014
- Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive careEmergencias, 2013
- Minimally Invasive Measurement of Cardiac Output during Surgery and Critical CareAnesthesiology, 2010
- A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement TechniquesJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1999
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986