The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Folia Linguistica
- Vol. 45 (1), 31-80
- https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2011.002
Abstract
The general distinction between morphology and syntax is widely taken for granted, but it crucially depends on a cross-linguistically valid concept of ‘(morphosyntactic) word’. I show that there are no good criteria for defining such a concept. I examine ten criteria in some detail (potential pauses, free occurrence, mobility, uninterruptibility, non-selectivity, non-coordinatability, anaphoric islandhood, nonextractability, morphophonological idiosyncrasies, and deviations from bi-uniqueness), and I show that none of them is necessary and sufficient on its own, and no combination of them gives a definition of ‘word’ that accords with linguists' orthographic practice. ‘Word’ can be defined as a language-specific concept, but this is not relevant to the general question pursued here. ‘Word’ can be defined as a fuzzy concept, but this is theoretically meaningful only if the continuum between affixes and words, or words and phrases, shows some clustering, for which there is no systematic evidence at present. Thus, I conclude that we do not currently have a good basis for dividing the domain of morphosyntax into morphology and syntax, and that linguists should be very careful with general claims that make crucial reference to a cross-linguistic ‘word’ notion.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the history of definiteness marking in ScandinavianJournal of Linguistics, 2009
- Linearization-based word-part ellipsisLinguistics and Philosophy, 2008
- Big words, small phrases: Mismatches between pause units and the polysynthetic word in DalabonLinguistics, 2008
- Free Prefix Ordering in ChintangLanguage, 2007
- Revisiting Anaphoric IslandsLanguage, 2006
- Are Turkish Preverbal Bare Nouns Syntactic Arguments?Linguistic Inquiry, 2004
- Where in the Word is the Udi Clitic?Language, 2000
- Bound morphemes, coordination and bracketing paradoxJournal of Linguistics, 1999
- The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from BantuNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1995
- Delimitation of Syntactic UnitsLanguage, 1954