Dyadic interventions for community-dwelling people with dementia and their family caregivers: a systematic review
Open Access
- 24 July 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Psychogeriatrics
- Vol. 25 (10), 1581-1603
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610213000860
Abstract
Background:In this review, we study the effects of dyadic psychosocial interventions focused on community-dwelling people with dementia and their family caregivers, and the relationship of the effects with intervention components of programs.Methods:A search from January 2005 to January 2012 led to 613 hits, which we reviewed against our inclusion criteria. We added studies from 1992 to 2005 reviewed by Smits et al. (Smits, C. H. M., De Lange, J., Droes, R.-M., Meiland, F., Vernooij-Dassen, M. and Pot, A. M. (2007). Effects of combined intervention programs for people with dementia living at home and their caregivers: a systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 1181–1193). We assessed the methodological quality of 41 programs with the Cochrane criteria and two items of the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine guidelines.Results:Studies of moderate to high quality concerning 20 different dyadic psychosocial programs for people with dementia and caregivers were included. Nineteen of these programs show significant effects on the patient with dementia, the caregiver, or both. Due to differences in the programs and the studies, this study does not provide an unequivocal answer about which programs are most effective. Programs with intervention components that actively train one or more specific functional domains for the person with dementia and/or the caregiver seem to have a beneficial impact on that domain, although there are exceptions. Reasons can be found in the program itself, the implementation of the program, and the study design.Conclusions:Dyadic psychosocial programs are effective, but the outcomes for the person with dementia and the caregiver vary. More attention is needed for matching the targeted functional domains, intervention components, and delivery characteristics of a program with the needs of the person with dementia and the family caregiver.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- A multicentre RCT on community occupational therapy in Alzheimer's disease: 10 sessions are not better than one consultationBMJ Open, 2011
- Increasing Walking and Bright Light Exposure to Improve Sleep in Community‐Dwelling Persons with Alzheimer's Disease: Results of a Randomized, Controlled TrialJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2011
- Why did an effective Dutch complex psycho-social intervention for people with dementia not work in the German healthcare context? Lessons learnt from a process evaluation alongside a multicentre RCTBMJ Open, 2010
- Early-Stage Memory Loss Support Groups: Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Clinical TrialThe Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2010
- Targeting and Managing Behavioral Symptoms in Individuals with Dementia: A Randomized Trial of a Nonpharmacological InterventionJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2010
- Informal caregivers of persons with dementia, their use of and needs for specific professional support: a survey of the National Dementia ProgrammeBMC Nursing, 2010
- Experience of unpleasant sensations in the mouth after injection of saline from prefilled syringesBMC Nursing, 2010
- 2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review GroupSpine, 2009
- Systematic review of information and support interventions for caregivers of people with dementiaBMC Geriatrics, 2007
- Community based occupational therapy for patients with dementia and their care givers: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2006