Why can’t we just ask? The influence of research methods on results. The case of the “bystander effect”
Open Access
- 1 June 2016
- journal article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Polish Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 47 (2), 233-235
- https://doi.org/10.1515/ppb-2016-0027
Abstract
The article discusses the issue of the departure from examining real behaviours in a real environment, a trend in social psychology which has been observed going back several years, and the impact of this phenomenon for social psychology as a scientific discipline. The article presents two studies on the well-known and explored “bystander effect” (Darley, Latane, 1968). This phenomenon is examined in two ways – once by way of a “traditional” field experiment conducted in natural conditions, and once through a survey. As it turned out, the results generated by the two studies were diametrically opposite, and only in the field experiment were we able to achieve a pattern of results consistent with those in the original studies.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies.Psychological Bulletin, 2011
- We Have to Break UpPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2009
- Normative Social Influence is UnderdetectedPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2008
- Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements: Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2007