Effects of feeding frequency on intake, ruminal fermentation, and feeding behavior in heifers fed high-concentrate diets1
Open Access
- 1 October 2007
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Animal Science
- Vol. 85 (10), 2538-2547
- https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-739
Abstract
Four ruminally fistulated Holstein heifers (BW = 385 ± 6.2 kg) were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square experiment to determine the effect of feeding frequency on intake, water consumption, ruminal fermentation, and feeding and animal behavior. The treatments consisted of different feeding frequencies: a) once daily (T1); b) twice daily (T2); c) 3 times daily (T3); and d) 4 times daily (T4). Heifers were offered ad libitum access to concentrate and barley straw. Feeding frequency did not affect DMI (P >0.10), but water consumption tended to increase linearly as feeding frequency increased (P = 0.08). Average ruminal pH was not affected (P >0.10) by feeding frequency, but at 12 h after feeding ruminal pH was greater for T2 than for the other treatments. Total VFA concentration and VFA proportions were not affected (P >0.10) by feeding frequency, except valerate proportion, which increased linearly (P = 0.05) as feeding frequency increased. The concentration of ammonia-N was affected (P 0.05), except for observational behavior, for which there was a linear decrease as feeding frequency increased (P = 0.02). Heifers spent the same time on chewing activities, independent of feeding frequency. However, meal criteria tended to be affected (P = 0.07) by feeding frequency, with T2 (39.4 min) showing the longest intermeal interval. Total daily meal time, meal frequency, and meal size were not affected by feeding frequency (P >0.10), whereas meal length and eating rate showed cubic tendencies (P = 0.10 and P = 0.06, respectively) as feeding frequency increased. These results suggest that in the present experimental conditions, with heifers fed high-concentrate diets and with noncompetitive feeding, a smaller range of ruminal pH values was observed when feed was offered twice daily. Although heifers spent the same time on chewing activities, more stable ruminal conditions were probably achieved by feeding twice daily due to the rumination pattern, which was more constant during daytime in T2 than in T1. Moreover, when daytime and nighttime ruminating activity were analyzed separately, this activity was different in T1 (17.3 vs. 30.8%, respectively; P 0.05). Copyright © 2007. . Copyright 2007 Journal of Animal ScienceKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Frequency of Feed Delivery Affects the Behavior of Lactating Dairy CowsJournal of Dairy Science, 2005
- Influence of Corn Processing and Frequency of Feeding on Cow Performance,Journal of Dairy Science, 2002
- The Effects of Frequency of Feeding a Total Mixed Ration on the Production and Behavior of Dairy CowsJournal of Dairy Science, 2001
- On the interpretation of feeding behaviour measures and the use of feeding rate as an indicator of social constraintApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 1999
- Modeling Ruminal pH Fluctuations: Interactions Between Meal Frequency and Digestion RateJournal of Dairy Science, 1997
- The influence of intake level and corn processing on digestibility and ruminal metabolism in steers fed all-concentrate dietsJournal of Animal Science, 1994
- Variation in and Relationships Among Feeding, Chewing, and Drinking Variables for Lactating Dairy CowsJournal of Dairy Science, 1994
- Effects of Feed Processing and Frequency of Feeding on Ruminal Fermentation, Milk Production, and Milk CompositionJournal of Dairy Science, 1990
- Effects of Feeding Frequency on Ruminal Parameters, Plasma Insulin, Milk Yield, and Milk Composition in Holstein CowsJournal of Dairy Science, 1990
- Influence of the composition of the ration and the feeding frequency on ph-regulation in the rumen and on feed in-take in ruminantsLivestock Production Science, 1976