DIFFERENCE LIMEN AND RECRUITMENT
- 1 November 1954
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
- Vol. 60 (5), 525-540
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1954.00720010540001
Abstract
THE NEED for the measurement of recruitment is apparent in the speed with which "recruitment tests" have been provided by manufacturers of audiometers and are incorporated in clinical routines, even before sufficient validating work has been done. This need presumably arises in connection with diagnosis. No one doubts by now that the presence of recruitment is indicative of a nonconductive hearing loss. Furthermore, if the thesis of Dix, Hallpike, and Hood1 is substantiated, even finer diagnoses can distinguish between cochlear and retrocochlear pathologies. Recruitment is defined primarily as a more-rapid-than-normal increase in subjective loudness for a given increase in physical intensity. It is most readily explored, according to this definition, by the binaural loudness balance, described originally by Fowler.2 In this technique one measures the intensities of two tones (one presented to the left, the other to the right ear) when the listener reports that they sound equallyKeywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development Of Materials For Speech AudiometryJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1952
- Recruitment of loudness in the differential diagnosis of end‐organ and nerve fibre deafnessThe Laryngoscope, 1951
- Differential sensitivity to intensity as a function of the duration of the comparison tone.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1944
- The Intensive Difference Limen in AuditionThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1941
- The Validity of the Just Noticeable Difference as a Unit of Psychological MagnitudeTransactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 1933
- Differential Intensity Sensitivity of the Ear for Pure TonesPhysical Review B, 1928