An observational cohort study on shortened dental arches—clinical course during a period of 27–35 years
Open Access
- 29 June 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Clinical Oral Investigations
- Vol. 17 (3), 859-866
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0765-6
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical course of shortened dental arches (‘SDA group’) compared to SDAs plus removable denture prosthesis (‘SDA plus RDP group’) and complete dental arches (‘CDA group’, controls). Data (numbers of direct and indirect restorations, endodontic treatments, tooth loss and tooth replacements) were extracted from patient records of subjects attending the Nijmegen Dental School who previously participated in a cohort study on shortened dental arches with three to four posterior occluding pairs (POPs). Records of 35 % of the original cohort were retrievable. At the end of the follow-up (27.4 ± 7.1 years), 20 out of 23 SDA subjects still had SDA with 3–4 POPs compared to 6 out of 13 for SDA plus RDP subjects (follow-up 32.6 ± 7.3 years). Sixteen out of 23 CDA subjects still had CDA; none of them lost more than one POP (follow-up 35.0 ± 5.6 years). SDA group lost 67 teeth: 16 were not replaced, 16 were replaced by FDP and 35 teeth (lost in three subjects) replaced by RDP. Mean number of treatments per year in SDA subjects differed not significantly compared to CDA subjects except for indirect restorations in the upper jaw. Shortened dental arches can last for 27 years and over. Clinical course in SDA plus RDP is unfavourable, especially when RDP-related interventions are taken into account. The shortened dental arch concept seems to be a relevant approach from a cost-effective point of view. Replacement of absent posterior teeth by free-end RDP cannot be recommended.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Occlusion and Temporomandibular Function among Subjects with Mandibular Distal Extension Removable Partial DenturesInternational Journal of Dentistry, 2010
- A clinical follow-up study of the periodontal conditions of RPD abutment and non-abutment teethJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2010
- Masticatory performance, maximum occlusal force, and occlusal contact area in patients with bilaterally missing molars and distal extension removable partial dentures.2009
- Time to Survival for the Restoration of the Shortened Lower Dental ArchJournal of Dental Research, 2007
- Caries incidence following restoration of shortened lower dental arches in a randomized controlled trialBritish Dental Journal, 2001
- Occlusal stability in shortened dental arches.Journal of Dental Research, 2001
- An Overview of Reasons for the Placement and Replacement of RestorationsPrimary Dental Care, 2001
- Quality of life assessment of bone-anchored fixed partial denture patients with unilateral mandibular distal-extension edentulismThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1999
- Incidence of tooth loss and dental caries in 60‐, 70‐ and 80‐year‐old Swedish individualsCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 1997
- Oral comfort in shortened dental arches*Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1990