Classical Metric Diophantine Approximation Revisited: The Khintchine-Groshev Theorem
- 5 August 2009
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Mathematics Research Notices
- Vol. 2010 (1), 69-86
- https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnp119
Abstract
Let denote the set of ψ-approximable points in . Under the assumption that the approximating function ψ is monotonic, the classical Khintchine–Groshev theorem provides an elegant probabilistic criterion for the Lebesgue measure of . The famous Duffin–Schaeffer counterexample shows that the monotonicity assumption on ψ is absolutely necessary when m = n = 1. On the other hand, it is known that monotonicity is not necessary when n ≥ 3 (Schmidt) or when n = 1 and m ≥ 2 (Gallagher). Surprisingly, when n = 2, the situation is unresolved. We deal with this remaining case and thereby remove all unnecessary conditions from the classical Khintchine–Groshev theorem. This settles a multidimensional analog of Catlin's conjecture.Keywords
Other Versions
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Mass Transference Principle and the Duffin–Schaeffer conjecture for Hausdorff measuresAnnals of Mathematics, 2006
- The k ‐dimensional Duffin and Schaeffer conjectureMathematika, 1990
- Two problems in metric diophantine approximation, IJournal of Number Theory, 1976
- Metric simultaneous diophantine approximation (II)Mathematika, 1965
- A Metrical Theorem in Diophantine ApproximationCanadian Journal of Mathematics, 1960
- Khintchine’s problem in metric Diophantine approximationDuke Mathematical Journal, 1941
- Einige Sätze über Kettenbrüche, mit Anwendungen auf die Theorie der Diophantischen ApproximationenMathematische Annalen, 1924