Is Polarization a Myth?
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The Journal of Politics
- Vol. 70 (2), 542-555
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381608080493
Abstract
This article uses data from the American National Election Studies and national exit polls to test Fiorina's assertion that ideological polarization in the American public is a myth. Fiorina argues that twenty-first-century Americans, like the midtwentieth-century Americans described by Converse, “are not very well-informed about politics, do not hold many of their views very strongly, and are not ideological” (2006, 19). However, our evidence indicates that since the 1970s, ideological polarization has increased dramatically among the mass public in the United States as well as among political elites. There are now large differences in outlook between Democrats and Republicans, between red state voters and blue state voters, and between religious voters and secular voters. These divisions are not confined to a small minority of activists—they involve a large segment of the public and the deepest divisions are found among the most interested, informed, and active citizens. Moreover, contrary to Fiorina's suggestion that polarization turns off voters and depresses turnout, our evidence indicates that polarization energizes the electorate and stimulates political participation.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transformations of the Concept of Ideology in the Twentieth CenturyAmerican Political Science Review, 2006
- The Battle Over a U.S. Culture War: A Note on Inflated Rhetoric Versus Inflamed PoliticsThe Forum, 2005
- Partisan and Ideological Polarization in the California ElectorateState Politics & Policy Quarterly, 2004
- Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes Toward Abortion: A Review and Research AgendaPolitical Research Quarterly, 2003
- Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American ElectorateAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2002
- Issue Evolution, Political Parties, and the Culture WarsPolitical Research Quarterly, 2002
- Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite PolarizationAmerican Political Science Review, 2001
- D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call VotingLegislative Studies Quarterly, 2001
- Cultural Conflict in American Politics: Religious Traditionalism, Postmaterialism, and U.S. Political BehaviorThe Journal of Politics, 1997
- Religion and Political Behavior in the United States: The Impact of Beliefs, Affiliations, and Commitment From 1980 to 1994Public Opinion Quarterly, 1997