Disparities in Enrollment and Use of an Electronic Patient Portal
Open Access
- 3 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 26 (10), 1112-1116
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1728-3
Abstract
With emphasis on the meaningful use of electronic health records, patient portals are likely to become increasingly important. Little is known about patient enrollment in, and use of, patient portals after explicit invitation from providers. To examine enrollment in, and use of, an electronic patient portal by race/ethnicity, gender and age. Observational, cross sectional study. Patients with attending physicians seen at one urban, academic primary care practice between May 2008 and October 2009 who received electronic orders inviting their participation in an electronic patient portal. (a) Enrollment in the patient portal, (b) Solicitation of provider advice among enrollees, (c) Requests for medication refills among enrollees. Overall, 69% of 7,088 patients enrolled in the patient portal. All minority patients were significantly less likely to enroll than whites: 55% blacks, 64% Latinos and 66% Asians compared with 74% whites (chi-square p < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). These disparities persisted in adjusted analyses, although differences for Asians were no longer significant. In addition, the oldest patients were less likely to enroll than the youngest (adjusted OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.97). Although there were no racial/ethnic disparities in use of the patient portal among enrollees, we found differences by age and gender. The youngest patients were significantly less likely to solicit provider advice or request medication refills than any other age group in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Similarly, male patients were less likely to solicit provider advice than women in all analyses. Large racial/ethnic disparities were seen in enrollment in our patient portal. Among enrollees, use of the portal was similar by race/ethnicity, but not by age or gender. Future efforts to expand use of the patient portal need to address potential mechanisms for these disparities to ensure this technology is accessible to diverse patient populations.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Literacy Divide: Health Literacy and the Use of an Internet-Based Patient Portal in an Integrated Health System—Results from the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)Journal of Health Communication, 2010
- The influence of gender on the doctor–patient interactionPatient Education and Counseling, 2009
- Disparities in Use of a Personal Health Record in a Managed Care OrganizationJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2009
- Applying Quality Measures and Guidelines in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome and Venous Thromboembolism IntroductionJournal of Managed Care Pharmacy, 2008
- Gender Differences in Health Care Expenditures, Resource Utilization, and Quality of CareJournal of Managed Care Pharmacy, 2008
- Who Uses the Patient Internet Portal? The PatientSite ExperienceJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2006
- Use Of Geocoding In Managed Care Settings To Identify Quality DisparitiesHealth Affairs, 2005
- Use of e-Health Services between 1999 and 2002: A Growing Digital DivideJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2004
- Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic IllnessJAMA, 2002
- On the Validity of Using Census Geocode Characteristics to Proxy Individual Socioeconomic CharacteristicsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996