Sample size calculations are poorly conducted and reported in many randomized trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis: results of a systematic review
Open Access
- 1 December 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 104, 52-61
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.013
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bayesian Sample Size Determination for a Clinical Trial with Correlated Continuous and Binary OutcomesJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2013
- Sample size determinations in original research protocols for randomised clinical trials submitted to UK research ethics committees: reviewBMJ, 2013
- Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact medical journalsBMC Research Notes, 2011
- Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: reviewBMJ, 2009
- Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized TrialPLOS ONE, 2007
- Statistical Review by Research Ethics CommitteesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2000
- The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hipArthritis & Rheumatism, 1991
- Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: Classification of osteoarthritis of the kneeArthritis & Rheumatism, 1986
- Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?BMJ, 1980
- Radiological Assessment of Osteo-ArthrosisAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 1957