Randomised comparison of distension media for outpatient hysteroscopy
Open Access
- 15 December 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 111 (1), 57-62
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.00004.x
Abstract
Objective To compare saline with and without added lignocaine and carbon dioxide distension for out patient hysteroscopy with regards to patient discomfort and hysteroscopic view. Design Single blind prospective randomised controlled trial. Setting Specialist out patient clinics in a large teaching hospital. Population Women undergoing out patient hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy for abnormal uterine bleeding. Method Out patient hysteroscopy using carbon dioxide, saline or saline with lignocaine. Main outcome measures Visual analogue score (VAS) for pain and present pain intensity (PPI) as assessed by patients and the quality of hysteroscopic view as assessed by the operator. Results Of the 305 women approached, 300 women were randomised into the study. The mean [SD] VAS for pain in the carbon dioxide group was 2.9 [2.3] and in the saline group was 3.1 [2.6], the difference was not statistically significant (P= 0.49). The mean [SD] VAS for pain in the saline plus lignocaine group was 3.2 [2.4]. This was not significantly different from the saline group (P= 0.72). There was a statistically significant difference between the confidence rating for the hysteroscopic view for the carbon dioxide compared with the saline group; mean [SD] was 8.3 [2.1] and 9.6 [1.1], respectively (P= 0.001). Conclusion Carbon dioxide and saline as distension media are comparable in terms of overall patient discomfort and satisfaction, but saline provides better views and increases confidence in diagnosis. Adding lignocaine to the saline distension medium does not confer any additional benefit.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial of transcervical intrauterine local anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000
- Acceptability and pain of outpatient hysteroscopyThe Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 2000
- Flexible outpatient hysteroscopy without anaesthesia: a safe, successful and well tolerated procedureBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- Randomised placebo controlled trial of mefenamic acid for premedication at outpatient hysteroscopy: a pilot studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- Lignocaine aerosol spray in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trialFertility and Sterility, 1997
- Topical anaesthesia for diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women: a randomised placebo‐controlled double‐blind studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- Comparison of carbon dioxide and normal saline for uterine distension in outpatient hysteroscopyFertility and Sterility, 1996
- How well do perimenopausal patients accept outpatient hysteroscopy? Visual analogue scoring of acceptability and pain in 100 womenEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1993
- Outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methodsPain, 1975