Disease-specific Pay-for-Performance Programs
- 1 November 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medical Care
- Vol. 54 (11), 977-983
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000598
Abstract
Several studies have investigated the effects of pay-for-performance (P4P) initiatives. However, little is known about whether patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) would benefit from P4P initiatives similarly to patients without MCC. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of the diabetes mellitus pay-for-performance (DM-P4P) program on the quality of diabetic care between type 2 diabetic patients with and without MCC. This study used data from Taiwan’s Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005. Of this cohort, 52,276 diabetic patients were identified. To address potential selection bias between the intervention and comparison groups, the propensity score matching method was used. Generalized estimating equations were applied to analyze the difference-in-difference model to examine the effect of the intervention, the DM-P4P program. The disease-specific DM-P4P program had positive impacts on process and outcome indicators of health care quality regardless of patients’ MCC status. Diabetic patients with MCC experienced a significantly larger decrease in the admission rate of diabetes-related ambulatory care sensitive conditions after the P4P enrollment over time compared with patients without MCC. The positive impacts on use of diabetes-related services were comparable between diabetic patients with and without MCC. Most importantly, for MCC patients, the disease-specific DM-P4P program had a stronger positive impact on health outcomes. Hence, the commonly observed phenomenon of “cherry picking” in implementing P4P strategies may lead to disparities in the quality of diabetic care between diabetic patients with and without MCC.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends in the Prevalence of Multiple Chronic Conditions in Taiwan From 2000 to 2010: A Population-Based StudyPreventing Chronic Disease, 2014
- Effects of pay for performance in health care: A systematic review of systematic reviewsHealth Policy, 2013
- Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literatureBMC Health Services Research, 2011
- Aging with multimorbidity: A systematic review of the literatureAgeing Research Reviews, 2011
- Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health careBMC Health Services Research, 2010
- Lessons From Evaluations of Purchaser Pay-for-Performance ProgramsMedical Care Research and Review, 2008
- In Chronic Condition: Experiences Of Patients With Complex Health Care Needs, In Eight Countries, 2008Health Affairs, 2008
- Multiple Chronic Conditions: Prevalence, Health Consequences, and Implications for Quality, Care Management, and CostsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Does Pay-for-Performance Improve the Quality of Health Care?Annals of Internal Medicine, 2006
- Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality of Care for Older Patients With Multiple Comorbid DiseasesJAMA, 2005