Only Half Right: Species with Female-Biased Sexual Size Dimorphism Consistently Break Rensch's Rule
Open Access
- 19 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 2 (9), e897
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000897
Abstract
Most animal species display Sexual Size Dimorphism (SSD): males and females consistently attain different sizes, most frequently with females being larger than males. However the selective mechanisms driving patterns of SSD remain controversial. ‘Rensch's rule’ proposes a general scaling phenomenon for all taxa, whereby SSD increases with average body size when males are larger than females, and decreases with body size when females are larger than males. Rensch's rule appears to be general in the former case, but there is little evidence for the rule when females are larger then males. Using comprehensive data for 1291 species of birds across 30 families, we find strong support for Rensch's rule in families where males are typically larger than females, but no overall support for the rule in families with female-biased SSD. Reviewing previous studies of a broad range of taxa (arthropods, reptiles, fish and birds) showing predominantly female-biased SSD, we conclude that Rensch's conjecture is the exception rather than the rule in such species. The absence of consistent scaling of SSD in taxa with female-biased SSD, the most prevalent direction of dimorphism, calls into question previous general evolutionary explanations for Rensch's rule. We propose that, unlike several other ecological scaling relationships, Rensch's rule does not exist as an independent scaling phenomenon.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour?Journal of Animal Ecology, 2006
- Global Patterns of Geographic Range Size in BirdsPLoS Biology, 2006
- The allometry of ornaments and weaponsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006
- Sexual size dimorphism and sex ratios in dragonflies (Odonata)Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005
- Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism: Testing Two Hypotheses for Rensch’s Rule in the Water StriderAquarius remigisThe American Naturalist, 2005
- TOWARD A METABOLIC THEORY OF ECOLOGYEcology, 2004
- PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND EYE-SPAN ALLOMETRY IN STALK-EYED FLIES (DIOPSIDAE)Evolution, 2001
- A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating systems in water striders (Hemiptera: Gerridae)Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1997
- Sexual dimorphism inAnastrepha suspensa (Loew) and other tephritid fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): Possible roles of developmental rate, fecundity, and dispersalJournal of Insect Behavior, 1992
- Sexual dimorphism in body size: Are larger species more dimorphic?Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1986