Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic responses to biophysical shocks
- 16 December 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 111 (9), 3274-3279
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222465110
Abstract
Agricultural production is sensitive to weather and thus directly affected by climate change. Plausible estimates of these climate change impacts require combined use of climate, crop, and economic models. Results from previous studies vary substantially due to differences in models, scenarios, and data. This paper is part of a collective effort to systematically integrate these three types of models. We focus on the economic component of the assessment, investigating how nine global economic models of agriculture represent endogenous responses to seven standardized climate change scenarios produced by two climate and five crop models. These responses include adjustments in yields, area, consumption, and international trade. We apply biophysical shocks derived from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s representative concentration pathway with end-of-century radiative forcing of 8.5 W/m2. The mean biophysical yield effect with no incremental CO2 fertilization is a 17% reduction globally by 2050 relative to a scenario with unchanging climate. Endogenous economic responses reduce yield loss to 11%, increase area of major crops by 11%, and reduce consumption by 3%. Agricultural production, cropland area, trade, and prices show the greatest degree of variability in response to climate change, and consumption the lowest. The sources of these differences include model structure and specification; in particular, model assumptions about ease of land use conversion, intensification, and trade. This study identifies where models disagree on the relative responses to climate shocks and highlights research activities needed to improve the representation of agricultural adaptation responses to climate change.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A trend-preserving bias correction – the ISI-MIP approachPublished by Copernicus GmbH ,2013
- Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targetsEnergy Policy, 2011
- Geography Matters: International Trade Patterns and the Indirect Land Use Effects of BiofuelsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2011
- The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulationsGeoscientific Model Development, 2011
- The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessmentNature, 2010
- The end of model democracy?Climatic Change, 2010
- How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements?Economic Modelling, 2007
- The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in EuropeAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2006
- Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment, 1990–2080Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- Potential impact of climate change on world food supplyNature, 1994