Labor rights and labor power and welfare maximization in a market economy ‐ Revising the conventional wisdom
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in International Journal of Social Economics
- Vol. 27 (12), 1252-1269
- https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290010354063
Abstract
Standard neoclassical theory argues that an economy is negatively affected by increased labor rights and power since it is assumed that economic agents are always x‐efficient; performing at the height of efficiency. However, a behavioral model of the firm suggests that more rights and power, with its positive impact on labor standards, need not produce the deleterious results predicted by conventional economic wisdom, due to their productivity‐efficiency enhancing impact on the firm. This suggests that we should not assess the impact of enhanced labor power and control in terms of a zero sum game. It is possible to have both equilibrium improvements in working conditions and economic prosperity, with the former contributing to the latter.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Methodology of Economics and the Survival Principle Revisited and Revised: Some Welfare and Public Policy Implications of Modeling the Economic AgentReview of Social Economy, 1999
- Child Labor: Cause, Consequence, and Cure, with Remarks on International Labor StandardsJournal of Economic Literature, 1999
- What Works at Work: Overview and AssessmentIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1996
- Are Your Wages Set in Beijing?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995
- Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of peopleAcademy of Management Perspectives, 1995
- The organizational foundations of X-inefficiency: A game-theoretic interpretation of Argyris' model of organizational learningJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1994
- The Economics of Exogenous Increases in Wage Rates in a Behavioral/X-Efficiency Model of the FirmReview of Social Economy, 1992
- The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and UnemploymentThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1990
- IntroductionPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1986
- Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling BehindThe Journal of Economic History, 1986