Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
Open Access
- 16 October 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (10), e75919
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075919
Abstract
Standardised or ‘plain’ tobacco packaging was introduced in Australia in December 2012 and is currently being considered in other countries. The primary objective of this systematic review was to locate, assess and synthesise published and grey literature relating to the potential impacts of standardised tobacco packaging as proposed by the guidelines for the international Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: reduced appeal, increased salience and effectiveness of health warnings, and more accurate perceptions of product strength and harm. Electronic databases were searched and researchers in the field were contacted to identify studies. Eligible studies were published or unpublished primary research of any design, issued since 1980 and concerning tobacco packaging. Twenty-five quantitative studies reported relevant outcomes and met the inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Studies that explored the impact of package design on appeal consistently found that standardised packaging reduced the appeal of cigarettes and smoking, and was associated with perceived lower quality, poorer taste and less desirable smoker identities. Although findings were mixed, standardised packs tended to increase the salience and effectiveness of health warnings in terms of recall, attention, believability and seriousness, with effects being mediated by the warning size, type and position on pack. Pack colour was found to influence perceptions of product harm and strength, with darker coloured standardised packs generally perceived as containing stronger tasting and more harmful cigarettes than fully branded packs; lighter coloured standardised packs suggested weaker and less harmful cigarettes. Findings were largely consistent, irrespective of location and sample. The evidence strongly suggests that standardised packaging will reduce the appeal of packaging and of smoking in general; that it will go some way to reduce consumer misperceptions regarding product harm based upon package design; and will help make the legally required on-pack health warnings more salient.This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and “plain” cigarette packaging: Evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United StatesHealth Policy, 2011
- The Impact of Cigarette Pack Design, Descriptors, and Warning Labels on Risk Perception in the U.S.American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2011
- Impact of Female-Oriented Cigarette Packaging in the United StatesNicotine & Tobacco Research, 2011
- Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non‐smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokersAddiction, 2011
- Packaging development: A conceptual framework for identifying new product opportunitiesMarketing Theory, 2010
- Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokersTobacco Control, 2010
- How packaging affects the product preferences of children and the buyer behaviour of their parents in the food industryYoung Consumers, 2010
- How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental studyTobacco Control, 2008
- Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behavioursEmerging Themes in Epidemiology, 2008
- Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings.Psychological Bulletin, 1980