A Test of the Metabolic Cost of Cushioning Hypothesis during Unshod and Shod Running
- 1 February 2014
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 46 (2), 324-329
- https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3182a63b81
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of surface and shoe cushioning on the metabolic cost of running. In running, the leg muscles generate force to cushion the impact with the ground. External cushioning (surfaces or shoes) may reduce the muscular effort needed for cushioning and thus reduce metabolic cost. Our primary hypothesis was that the metabolic cost of unshod running would decrease with a more cushioned running surface. We also hypothesized that because of the counteracting effects of shoe cushioning and mass, unshod running on a hard surface would have approximately the same metabolic cost as running in lightweight, cushioned shoes. To test these hypotheses, we attached 10- and 20-mm-thick slats of the same foam cushioning used in running shoe midsoles to the belt of a treadmill that had a rigid deck. Twelve subjects who preferred a midfoot strike pattern and had substantial barefoot/minimalist running experience ran without shoes on the normal treadmill belt and on each thickness of foam. They also ran with lightweight, cushioned shoes on the normal belt. We collected V˙O2 and V˙CO2 to calculate the metabolic power demand and used a repeated-measures ANOVA to compare between conditions. Compared to running unshod on the normal belt, running unshod on the 10-mm-thick foam required 1.63% ± 0.67% (mean ± SD) less metabolic power (P = 0.034) but running on the 20-mm-thick foam had no significant metabolic effect. Running with and without shoes on the normal belt had similar metabolic power demands, likely because the beneficial energetic effects of cushioning counterbalanced the detrimental effects of shoe mass. On average, surface and shoe cushioning reduce the metabolic power required for submaximal running.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Footwear and Strike Type on Running EconomyMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2012
- Economy of running: beyond the measurement of oxygen uptakeJournal of Applied Physiology, 2009
- Barefoot-Shod Running Differences: Shoe or Mass Effect?International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2007
- Shoe Midsole Longitudinal Bending Stiffness and Running Economy, Joint Energy, and EMGMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2006
- Mechanical Comparison of Barefoot and Shod RunningInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004
- Kinematic Adaptations during Running: Effects of Footwear, Surface, and DurationMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2004
- Energetics and mechanics of human running on surfaces of different stiffnessesJournal of Applied Physiology, 2002
- Effects of Shoe Cushioning Upon Ground Reaction Forces in RunningInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1983
- Ground reaction forces in distance runningJournal of Biomechanics, 1980
- Oxygen intake in track and treadmill running with observations on the effect of air resistanceJournal Of Physiology-London, 1970