Antibodies as a model system for comparative model refinement
- 2 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Vol. 78 (11), 2490-2505
- https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22757
Abstract
Predicting the conformations of loops is a critical aspect of protein comparative (homology) modeling. Despite considerable advances in developing loop prediction algorithms, refining loops in homology models remains challenging. In this work, we use antibodies as a model system to investigate strategies for more robustly predicting loop conformations when the protein model contains errors in the conformations of side chains and protein backbone surrounding the loop in question. Specifically, our test system consists of partial models of antibodies in which the “scaffold” (i.e., the portion other than the complementarity determining region, CDR, loops) retains native backbone conformation, whereas the CDR loops are predicted using a combination of knowledge‐based modeling (H1, H2, L1, L2, and L3) and ab initio loop prediction (H3). H3 is the most variable of the CDRs. Using a previously published method, a test set of 10 shorter H3 loops (5–7 residues) are predicted to an average backbone (NCαCO) RMSD of 2.7 Å while 11 longer loops (8–9 residues) are predicted to 5.1 Å, thus recapitulating the difficulties in refining loops in models. By contrast, in control calculations predicting the same loops in crystal structures, the same method reconstructs the loops to an average of 0.5 and 1.4 Å for the shorter and longer loops, respectively. We modify the loop prediction method to improve the ability to sample near‐native loop conformations in the models, primarily by reducing the sensitivity of the sampling to the loop surroundings, and allowing the other CDR loops to optimize with the H3 loop. The new method improves the average accuracy significantly to 1.3 Å RMSD and 3.1 Å RMSD for the shorter and longer loops, respectively. Finally, we present results predicting 8–10 residue loops within complete comparative models of five nonantibody proteins. While anecdotal, these mixed, full‐model results suggest our approach is a promising step toward more accurately predicting loops in homology models. Furthermore, while significant challenges remain, our method is a potentially useful tool for predicting antibody structures based on a known Fv scaffold. Proteins 2010.Keywords
This publication has 81 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toward high‐resolution homology modeling of antibody Fv regions and application to antibody–antigen dockingProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2008
- Prediction of protein loop structures using a local move Monte Carlo approach and a grid-based force fieldProtein Engineering, Design and Selection, 2008
- PIGS: automatic prediction of antibody structuresBioinformatics, 2008
- Toward better refinement of comparative models: Predicting loops in inexact environmentsProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2008
- Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction—Round VIIProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2007
- UCSF Chimera?A visualization system for exploratory research and analysisJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2004
- Modeling of loops in protein structuresProtein Science, 2000
- The Protein Data BankNucleic Acids Research, 2000
- CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choiceNucleic Acids Research, 1994
- CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculationsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1983