Are Populist Leaders Creating the Conditions for the Spread of COVID-19? Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties' Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe"
Open Access
- 1 August 2021
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Maad Rayan Publishing Company in International Journal of Health Policy and Management
- Vol. 10 (8), 511-515
- https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.124
Abstract
Do populist leaders contribute to the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? While all governments have struggled to respond to the pandemic, it is now becoming clear that some political leaders have performed much better than others. Among the worst performing are those that have risen to power on populist agendas, such as in the United States, Brazil, Russia, India, and the United Kingdom. Populist leaders have tended to: blame "others" for the pandemic, such as immigrants and the Chinese government; deny evidence and show contempt for institutions that generate it; and portray themselves as the voice of the common people against an out-of-touch 'elite.' In our short commentary, focusing on those countries with the most cases, we find that populist leaders appear to be undermining an effective response to COVID-19. Perversely, they may also gain politically from doing so, as historically populist leaders benefit from suffering and ill health. Clearly more research is needed on the curious correlation of populism and public health. Notwithstanding gaps in the evidence, health professionals have a duty to speak out against these practices to prevent avoidable loss of life.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deaths of Despair and Brexit Votes: Cross-Local Authority Statistical Analysis in England and WalesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2020
- Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social MediaSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2019
- Public health and politics: how political science can help us move forwardEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2018
- Policy, politics and public healthEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2017
- Diverging Life Expectancies and Voting Patterns in the 2016 US Presidential ElectionAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2017
- The essential role of physician as advocate: how and why we pass it onCanadian Medical Education Journal, 2017
- "Enemies of the People?" Public Health in the Era of Populist Politics Comment on "The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy"International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2017
- Advocacy as medical responsibilityCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2013
- The Physician as Health Advocate: Translating the Quest for Social Responsibility Into Medical Education and PracticeAcademic Medicine, 2011
- Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond?European Journal of Public Health, 2008