A Network Comparative Meta-analysis of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomies Using Anatomic Landmarks, Bronchoscopic, and Ultrasound Guidance Versus Open Surgical Tracheostomy
- 24 April 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Lung
- Vol. 197 (3), 267-275
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-019-00230-7
Abstract
Several different tracheostomy techniques (percutaneous and surgical) have been studied extensively in previous direct pairwise meta-analyses. However, a network comparative meta-analysis comparing all has not been conducted before.This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventionsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill obese patientsCritical Care, 2012
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Percutaneous dilatational versus conventional surgical tracheostomy in intensive care patientsNorth American Journal of Medical Sciences, 2011
- Ultrasound of the airwayIndian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2011
- Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: A randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Impact of Neck Length on the Safety of Percutaneous and Surgical Tracheotomy: a Prospective, Randomized StudyThe Laryngoscope, 2005
- Peri‐operative complications during percutaneous tracheostomy in obese patientsAnaesthesia, 2004
- Bedside Tracheostomy in the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Open Surgical Tracheostomy With Endoscopically Guided Percutaneous Dilational TracheotomyThe Laryngoscope, 2001
- Bronchoscopic guidance makes percutaneous tracheostomy a safe, cost-effective, and easy-to-teach procedureSurgery, 1995