Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar
Open Access
- 22 December 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 11 (12), e0168575
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168575
Abstract
The importance of ecosystems for supporting human well-being is increasingly recognized by both the conservation and development sectors. Our ability to conserve ecosystems that people rely on is often limited by a lack of spatially explicit data on the location and distribution of ecosystem services (ES), the benefits provided by nature to people. Thus there is a need to map ES to guide conservation investments, to ensure these co-benefits are maintained. To target conservation investments most effectively, ES assessments must be rigorous enough to support conservation planning, rapid enough to respond to decision-making timelines, and often must rely on existing data. We developed a framework for rapid spatial assessment of ES that relies on expert and stakeholder consultation, available data, and spatial analyses in order to rapidly identify sites providing multiple benefits. We applied the framework in Madagascar, a country with globally significant biodiversity and a high level of human dependence on ecosystems. Our objective was to identify the ES co-benefits of biodiversity priority areas in order to guide the investment strategy of a global conservation fund. We assessed key provisioning (fisheries, hunting and non-timber forest products, and water for domestic use, agriculture, and hydropower), regulating (climate mitigation, flood risk reduction and coastal protection), and cultural (nature tourism) ES. We also conducted multi-criteria analyses to identify sites providing multiple benefits. While our approach has limitations, including the reliance on proximity-based indicators for several ES, the results were useful for targeting conservation investments by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF). Because our approach relies on available data, standardized methods for linking ES provision to ES use, and expert validation, it has the potential to quickly guide conservation planning and investment decisions in other data-poor regions.Keywords
Funding Information
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (3519)
- Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unreported fishing, hungry people and political turmoil: the recipe for a food security crisis in Madagascar?Marine Policy, 2012
- Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continentsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road aheadJournal of Applied Ecology, 2011
- Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite dataGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 2010
- Bushmeat hunting and use in the Makira Forest, north-eastern Madagascar: a conservation and livelihoods issueOryx, 2009
- Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: Opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in MadagascarEcological Economics, 2009
- The Ecosystem Services Framework and Natural Capital ConservationEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2007
- Fifty years of deforestation and forest fragmentation in MadagascarEnvironmental Conservation, 2007
- Disappearing Lake Alaotra: Monitoring catastrophic erosion, waterway silting, and land degradation hazards in Madagascar using Landsat imageryJournal of African Earth Sciences, 2006
- RELATIONSHIPS OF STREAM INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES TO DEFORESTATION IN EASTERN MADAGASCAREcological Applications, 2003