Understanding recruitment: outcomes associated with alternate methods for seed selection in respondent driven sampling
Open Access
- 17 July 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 13 (1), 93-11
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-93
Abstract
Respondent driven sampling (RDS) was designed for sampling “hidden” populations and intended as a means of generating unbiased population estimates. Its widespread use has been accompanied by increasing scrutiny as researchers attempt to understand the extent to which the population estimates produced by RDS are, in fact, generalizable to the actual population of interest. In this study we compare two different methods of seed selection to determine whether this may influence recruitment and RDS measures. Two seed groups were established. One group was selected as per a standard RDS approach of study staff purposefully selecting a small number of individuals to initiate recruitment chains. The second group consisted of individuals self-presenting to study staff during the time of data collection. Recruitment was allowed to unfold from each group and RDS estimates were compared between the groups. A comparison of variables associated with HIV was also completed. Three analytic groups were used for the majority of the analyses–RDS recruits originating from study staff-selected seeds (n = 196); self-presenting seeds (n = 118); and recruits of self-presenting seeds (n = 264). Multinomial logistic regression demonstrated significant differences between the three groups across six of ten sociodemographic and risk behaviours examined. Examination of homophily values also revealed differences in recruitment from the two seed groups (e.g. in one arm of the study sex workers and solvent users tended not to recruit others like themselves, while the opposite was true in the second arm of the study). RDS estimates of population proportions were also different between the two recruitment arms; in some cases corresponding confidence intervals between the two recruitment arms did not overlap. Further differences were revealed when comparisons of HIV prevalence were carried out. RDS is a cost-effective tool for data collection, however, seed selection has the potential to influence which subgroups within a population are accessed. Our findings indicate that using multiple methods for seed selection may improve access to hidden populations. Our results further highlight the need for a greater understanding of RDS to ensure appropriate, accurate and representative estimates of a population can be obtained from an RDS sample.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating Consistency in Repeat Surveys of Injection Drug Users Recruited by Respondent-Driven Sampling in the Seattle Area: Results from the NHBS-IDU1 and NHBS-IDU2 SurveysAnnals of Epidemiology, 2012
- CommentaryEpidemiology, 2012
- Evaluation of Respondent-driven SamplingEpidemiology, 2012
- Evaluation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three HIV Testing Strategies Targeting African American Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in New York CityAnnals of Behavioral Medicine, 2011
- Effectiveness of Respondent-Driven Sampling to Recruit High Risk Heterosexual Men Who Have Multiple Female Sexual Partners: Differences in HIV Prevalence and Sexual Risk Behaviours Measured at Two Time PointsAIDS and Behavior, 2010
- Assessing respondent-driven samplingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Using Respondent-Driven Sampling Methodology for HIV Biological and Behavioral Surveillance in International Settings: A Systematic ReviewAIDS and Behavior, 2008
- Trends in Prevalence of HIV, Syphilis, Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B, and Sexual Risk Behavior Among Men Who Have Sex With MenJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2007
- Respondent-Driven Sampling II: Deriving Valid Population Estimates from Chain-Referral Samples of Hidden PopulationsSocial Problems, 2002
- Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden PopulationsSocial Problems, 1997