Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: which technique, which surgeon, for which patient? A study of the implementation in a teaching hospital
- 14 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
- Vol. 18 (3), 453-457
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-010-0348-3
Abstract
Background Single port cholecystectomy is increasingly performed. This procedure can be challenging, and we lack factors predicting the operative difficulty. Aims To assess the role of surgeon experience and identify possible predictive factors of intraoperative difficulties. Patients and methods Sixty‐one selected patients were prospectively enrolled between January 2008 and August 2010. Six surgeons were involved (3 seniors, 3 juniors). Anthropometrics of the patients, types of ports, exposure methods and intraoperative data were recorded. Pain was assessed with the visual analogic scale at postoperative day 1 (POD 1 VAS). Results Fifty‐eight patients with symptomatic gallstones and three with acute cholecystitis underwent single port cholecystectomy. The mean BMI, weight and height were 25.7 kg/m2 (SD 4.45), 71.8 kg (SD 14.83) and 166 cm SD 0.07, respectively. Mean operative time was 68.4 min (SD 26.98). Anthropometrics had no influence on operative time. Senior surgeons performed more rapidly, but the difference was not significant. The overall mean POD 1 VAS was 2.26, (SD 1.81). The mean hospital stay was 2.22 days, (SD 0.9). No complications occurred. An additional exposure method was necessary in 19 procedures. This cluster presented a significantly higher operating time (81.5 min, SD 31.69 vs. 62.7, SD 22.74;p = 0.01) and POD 1 VAS (1.92 vs. 3;p = 0.031). Conclusion Single trocar cholecystectomy can be implemented safely in teaching hospitals. Anthropometrics are not predictive of operative difficulties. The need for additional exposure systems affects the operative time and pain negatively, reflecting greater technical difficulties. Research to optimize instruments may help to solve these problems.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 casesSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trialSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatientsSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patientsSurgical Endoscopy, 2009
- The “invisible cholecystectomy”: A transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scarSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Conversions During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Risk Factors and Effects on Patient OutcomeJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2006
- Preoperative Grading System for Predicting Operative Conditions in Laparoscopic CholecystectomySurgery Today, 2004
- Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomySurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Access-related complications - an analysis of 6023 consecutive laparoscopic hernia repairsMinimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 2001