Effects of Motor Voter Legislation
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Politics Quarterly
- Vol. 25 (1), 104-117
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x9702500106
Abstract
The 1992 presidential election featured nine states and the District of Columbia with effective motor voter laws on the books. In 1996 all states will be required to have similar motor voter procedures. We conduct a multivariate analysis to compare turnout differences, partisan behav ior, and registration levels in motor voter and non-motor voter states. We find that rates of voter registration and turnout are significantly higher in motor voter states than in other states. In addition, it appears that these newly registered voters are just as likely to vote as other registered voters. We find no significant partisan advantage for either party in motor voter states.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does "Motor Voter" Work? Evidence from State-Level DataThe Journal of Politics, 1995
- Organizing From Diversity in the Name of Community: Lessons From the Disability Civil Rights MovementPolicy Studies Journal, 1994
- Where Is the Schema? Going Beyond the “S” Word in Political PsychologyAmerican Political Science Review, 1991
- Voter turnoutSociety, 1991
- A Reply to BennettPS: Political Science and Politics, 1990
- The Uses and Abuses of Registration and Turnout Data: An Analysis of Piven and Cloward's Studies of Nonvoting in AmericaPS: Political Science and Politics, 1990
- Residential Mobility and Voter TurnoutAmerican Political Science Review, 1987
- American Voter Turnout in Comparative PerspectiveAmerican Political Science Review, 1986
- Why Do People Vote? Because They Are RegisteredAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1981
- Voter Turnout and Electoral OscillationAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1981