Meta-Analysis of Rare Binary Adverse Event Data
- 1 June 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Vol. 107 (498), 555-567
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2012.664484
Abstract
We examine the use of fixed-effects and random-effects moment-based meta-analytic methods for analysis of binary adverse event data. Special attention is paid to the case of rare adverse events which are commonly encountered in routine practice. We study estimation of model parameters and between-study heterogeneity. In addition, we examine traditional approaches to hypothesis testing of the average treatment effect and detection of the heterogeneity of treatment effect across studies. We derive three new methods, simple (unweighted) average treatment effect estimator, a new heterogeneity estimator, and a parametric bootstrapping test for heterogeneity. We then study the statistical properties of both the traditional and new methods via simulation. We find that in general, moment-based estimators of combined treatment effects and heterogeneity are biased and the degree of bias is proportional to the rarity of the event under study. The new methods eliminate much, but not all of this bias. The various estimators and hypothesis testing methods are then compared and contrasted using an example dataset on treatment of stable coronary artery disease.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing Parameters of a Gamma Distribution for Small SamplesTechnometrics, 2009
- Why add anything to nothing? The arcsine difference as a measure of treatment effect in meta‐analysis with zero cellsStatistics in Medicine, 2008
- Normal-Based Methods for a Gamma DistributionTechnometrics, 2008
- Prognosis of stable angina pectoris: why we need larger population studies with higher endpoint resolutionHeart, 2006
- What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse dataStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Nonparametric estimation of heterogeneity variance for the standardised difference used in meta-analysisBiometrika, 2000
- Asymptotic Properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Likelihood Ratio Tests under Nonstandard ConditionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986